Message in a bottle to future self

Have mind/body routines, built around sleep and various states of brain waves. The key mystery is in the transit from the private world to the public world. Is inter-subjectivity isomorphic to objectivity? Truth ((Big history Dharma) is selfless thus on the outside but magick starts from self. Reality is strange looped. Map reality layers from the inside out and from the bottom up, the information-energy-matter triad.      

Follow synchronicities. There existed forward and backward worldlines from the beginning to the end. Future and past merge periodically and release. Think meaningful parallelism. Find your multiplicities and disguises. Keep folding/unfolding space-time patterns for (super) symmetry. Life responds because it self organize and converges towards orders.  

While the world connects more and more you are pushed into further and deeper loneliness. Be interesting for your own sake. Build outlets on balance. Actively unlock creative powers and cultivate subtle energy, for Qi is one ubiquitous interface among systems. Rider and horse need each others. The ultimate language is constructed for thought but command neurotransmitters or even outwards. 

Observe but leave some signposts in the labyrinth.  Connect threads until head meets tail. Decouple the world-knots progressively. We are all self-referenced and the answer is structural.  

Sun is still your inspiration. Illumination would shine through once you are truly rested. Have fun, and faith from time to time. Until then, breath and void are your best friends. 

Reality Code Repository GitHub

What if the objective reality (consensus reality) is built from the merging of the subjective worlds, like a distributed version control system? When does the parallel code got checked in and out into branches? Most likely sometimes in the sleep cycle, during which time the consciousness goes through different states (waking, dreaming, dreamless). Everyday each individual experiences reality shrift effortless: from selfless (dreamless) to pure subjective (dreaming) to intersubjective (or objective) worlds. The key question lies in how intersubjective become or is isomorphic with objective. Reality is the ultimate DevOps in action, where the release cycle was previous hidden but will be known someday. 

Think of God as "pull-request" in Process Theology:


"The deity receives the world of actual occasions into its experience; then, comparing what has actually occurred with the realm of pure possibility, God informs the world with new ideals (new aims), customized for each actual entity, for what realistically could be achieved. Whitehead sometimes refers to this aspect of the process as the superjective nature of God......

God is permanent in the sense of everlastingly envisioning the realm of possibility; the world is permanent as objectively immortal in God's memory. God is fluent in constantly acquiring new experiences of the world and the world is fluent in the rhythm of the birth and death of actual occasions.... The world is one in virtue of God's experience of it; the world is many because of the plurality of occasions that make it up. God is eminently actual in comparison to the world by achieving a unification of worldly occasions in the consequent nature that is beyond any of them taken singly; but the world is eminently actual in comparison to God's primordial nature, which is not concrete, although it is as infinite as the entire range of possibility....  God creates the world by informing it with possibilities (technically speaking, God provides “initial aims” for every nascent occasion). The world creates God, not by bringing God into existence, but by creating something in God, namely the material for what shall become objectively immortal."

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/process-theism/#WhiTwoNatGod

 

A simulated universe built by random sampling

Does demiurge play dice? I'd say yes. if we put the following synthesis together: Many-world interpretation, Monte Carlo simulation,  "the best of all possible worlds" thesis by Leibniz, and Path Integral. Our world is an aggregate of probability distributing after countless simulations, splits or paths. Then, against all odds we are here ((the chosen solution), thus arise the question of the anthropic principle. BTW, I'm more in line with Schopenhauer's assessment that our world must be one of the worst of all possible worlds.

Of course, it is also possible that all quantum uncertainty is all in the mind, according to Qbism. Then this world might be just a prolonged thought experiment.